Artificial Intelligence
●9 min read●November 11, 2025

DeepSeek V4 vs Qwen3 Max Thinking: Pricing and Access

Compare DeepSeek V4 and Qwen3 Max Thinking for low-cost coding and tool-based reasoning, with API pricing, context limits and deployment access.

Paras Tiwari
Paras TiwariFounder, Spectrum AI Labs
DeepSeek V4 vs Qwen3 Max Thinking: Pricing and Access

Get weekly AI tool reviews

We test tools so you don't have to. No spam.

Current status: October 1, 2026

This comparison covers the current DeepSeek API models and the January 2026 Qwen3-Max-Thinking release. It compares deployment choices and published prices; it does not claim a new head-to-head benchmark result.

When should I choose DeepSeek over Qwen3 Max Thinking?

Start with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when token cost, 1M context or image input matters. Evaluate Qwen3-Max-Thinking when your application uses Alibaba Cloud Model Studio and its supported reasoning tools. Compare task success and total spend in your own workflow before choosing.

Which Qwen3 Max price applies to thinking mode?

For Singapore International deployment, Alibaba Cloud lists input/output prices of $1.20/$6 up to 32K input tokens, $2.40/$12 above 32K and up to 128K, and $3/$15 above 128K and up to 256K, per million tokens. The cheaper Frankfurt Global tier is listed for non-thinking mode only.

Can I self-host both models?

DeepSeek publishes V4 Pro and V4.1 Flash weights under the MIT license. The Qwen3-Max-Thinking sources checked here document Qwen Chat and Alibaba Cloud Model Studio access; they do not establish a downloadable checkpoint or a self-hosting license for this model.

DeepSeek's current names are deepseek-flash for V4.1 Flash and deepseek-v4-pro for V4-Pro-0813. Qwen's thinking snapshot is qwen3-max-2026-01-23. Use the explicit snapshot when checking regional capabilities in Model Studio.

For a broader provider comparison, see the task-by-task model guide. For DeepSeek migration details, use the DeepSeek V4 guide.

Pricing, model limits and use cases, reviewed October 1, 2026
TL;DR

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has lower listed token rates than Qwen3-Max-Thinking on Singapore International deployment and a larger context window. Qwen is worth evaluating when you already use Model Studio or need its documented search and code-interpreter workflow. Region, thinking mode and request size affect the comparison.

DeepSeek V4 and Qwen3-Max-Thinking
Updated October 1, 2026
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash replaced the original V4 Flash API model on September 10
  • DeepSeek lists 1M context and up to 384K output for Flash and Pro
  • Qwen announced Qwen3-Max-Thinking on January 25, 2026
  • Qwen's thinking snapshot has 262,144 context and a 32,768-token maximum answer output
  • Qwen prices and tool support depend on deployment region and mode

Choose between these models by testing the work your application performs. DeepSeek offers open weights and lower listed token costs for the deployment compared here. Qwen offers hosted reasoning through Model Studio, with tools that vary by region.

1M
DeepSeek context
262,144
Qwen context
$1.20
Flash peak output
USD per 1M tokens
$6
Qwen output, ≤32K input
Singapore, USD per 1M tokens

Short answer

Pick a first test for your application's workload.

Where to start

WorkloadFirst model to evaluateReason
Bulk coding or long document requestsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLower listed token rates and 1M context
Self-hosted reasoningDeepSeek V4 Pro or V4.1 FlashPublished weights with MIT license terms
Reasoning with Model Studio toolsQwen3-Max-ThinkingDocumented hosted search and code interpreter; check regional support
Existing DeepSeek applicationCurrent Flash and ProTest both on your own tasks before changing the route

Model names and access

The API name determines which release you test.

Published limits and availability

ItemDeepSeekQwen3-Max-Thinking
Current API modelsdeepseek-flash; deepseek-v4-proqwen3-max-2026-01-23; qwen3-max alias
Context1M for both models262,144 tokens
Maximum answer output384K for both models32,768 tokens in thinking mode
Image inputFlash supports vision; Pro does notText input in the Model Studio specification
Tool accessTool calls and Responses APIFunction calls in Singapore International and Frankfurt EU; web search in Singapore
Self-hostingMIT-licensed weightsChecked sources document hosted access

Source: DeepSeek pricing and changelog; Alibaba Cloud qwen3-max model documentation

Qwen's January announcement describes adaptive search, memory and code interpreter in Qwen Chat. Model Studio documents search, web extraction and code interpreter for the thinking snapshot. Its regional capability tables differ: Singapore International supports function calling and web search, while Frankfurt EU lists function calling without web search. Confirm the endpoint and mode your application will use.

Keep API versions separate

The retired deepseek-v4-flash API name temporarily routes to V4.1 Flash. Results for the original V4 Flash do not describe the replacement model. Qwen3-Max-Thinking is the named January release in this comparison; it is not presented here as Qwen's latest model.

API pricing

Compare the same deployment mode and include reasoning output.

Listed prices checked October 1, 2026

Model / deploymentUncached inputOutputCondition
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.30 / $0.15$1.20 / $0.60Peak / off-peak
DeepSeek V4 Pro$1.32 / $0.66$3.96 / $1.98Peak / off-peak
Qwen3-Max-Thinking, Singapore International$1.20$6Input up to 32K
Qwen3-Max-Thinking, Singapore International$2.40$12Input above 32K and up to 128K
Qwen3-Max-Thinking, Singapore International$3$15Input above 128K and up to 256K

Source: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing/ ; https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/model-pricing

All prices are USD per million tokens. DeepSeek peak hours are Monday–Friday, 01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC, excluding Chinese public holidays; other hours are off-peak. Flash cached input is $0.006/$0.003 and Pro cached input is $0.044/$0.022, peak/off-peak. Alibaba's output price covers chain-of-thought and answer tokens. The table uses Singapore International thinking-mode rates; cheaper Frankfurt Global non-thinking rates do not describe that configuration.

Lower token prices can reduce bulk-work costs, but retries, tool results and long reasoning responses also affect the bill. Measure total spend per accepted result when you compare these models.

Provider benchmark results

The providers report different tests and configurations.

Selected published results

ModelBenchmarkProvider-reported resultSource context
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashTerminal-Bench 2.190.6DeepSeek model card; DeepSeek Harness Minimal, max reasoning
Qwen3-Max-ThinkingLiveCodeBench v685.9Qwen's January 25 announcement
Qwen3-Max-ThinkingSWE Verified75.3Qwen's January 25 announcement
Qwen3-Max-ThinkingHLE with tools49.8Qwen's January 25 announcement

Source: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash official model card; Qwen3-Max-Thinking official blog

Use these results to choose an evaluation

These figures come from the providers. Different benchmarks, release dates and agent setups prevent a direct winner from this table. Run a shared set of coding or reasoning tasks with the tools and token limits your application uses.

Which model should you choose?

Evaluate the trade-offs that affect your deployment.

For high-volume coding transformations, document extraction or image-assisted tasks, start with Flash and check accepted results, latency and cost. For a DeepSeek-only reasoning application, include Pro in the evaluation rather than assuming it wins every task. Both have published weights, although serving them requires a suitable inference deployment.

For an application built around Alibaba Cloud, test Qwen's thinking snapshot with your chosen region's supported tools. If the workflow depends on web search, the Frankfurt EU capability table changes the choice. If it requires a local checkpoint, the checked Qwen3-Max-Thinking sources do not supply the weight and license evidence needed for that deployment.

Official sources checked

Release, pricing and access sources reviewed October 1, 2026.

Before choosing

Check the full workload on the deployment you plan to use.

Record the model ID, region, thinking mode, input size and total token spend for each test. Compare successful task completions under the same constraints. Use the DeepSeek guide for migration steps and the cost calculator to estimate request volume.

Paras Tiwari
Written by
Paras Tiwari
Founder, Spectrum AI Labs

Founder of Spectrum AI Labs — testing AI tools and models, and writing up what actually ships.

More about Paras →

Need help choosing the right AI model?

Use our free tools to compare AI models by use case, cost, context length, and workflow fit.

Try the AI Model Picker